Three audiences. One engine.

The volume of data in disputes keeps growing, but the tooling hasn't kept up. Lawyers running high-value, complex litigation have no end-to-end platform for investigations, so they patch the gap with third parties and software that wasn't built for the job.

The cost is control: matters run through someone else's process, on someone else's timeline, and come back with answers that are slow and incomplete. That's expensive twice over, in client trust, and in revenue.

Tidebreak is the only end-to-end investigative tool built specifically for litigators. It's AI-first, but built for a profession that can't afford an AI that's confidently wrong: every claim traces to a retrieved document, or it's removed before you see it, and privileged material never enters the picture. No third parties, no bolted-on software.

The result is an analytical report you can actually stand behind, not just to your client, but to opposing counsel and the court. Better outcomes, on your infrastructure or ours, client data never leaves your estate, and a greater share of the revenue staying with the lawyers doing the work.

In-house teams don't get to choose their deadlines. A breach notification has a clock on it. A sanctions exposure has to be resolved before the next filing. And the document set behind either one keeps growing, mailboxes, ledgers, contracts, scans in three languages, far faster than any team can read it by the date it's due.

So the review gets scoped down to what's reachable in time, not what the matter actually contains. A screening tool checks the names you already have against a list. What it can't do is read the surrounding files and tell you why a match matters, the shell company routing round a sanctioned party, the pattern of money transfers that only looks innocent one at a time.

Tidebreak reads the entire set, not a filtered subset of it, and screens every entity and alias it finds against the OFAC, EU, UN and HMT lists as it goes, surfacing the exposure typology behind a match, not just the match itself. Every claim is cited to the document that supports it; anything it can't back up is removed before it reaches you, not flagged for you to chase down later. Every run is logged, the approver recorded, and every export signed, so the record can be handed to a regulator, not just a conclusion.

The result is a finding your board can act on and your regulator can accept, delivered inside the deadline, not around it.

Investigators live and die on one thing: being right. A missed connection, a fabricated lead, or a report that can't be retraced doesn't just cost time, it costs the reputation the whole job depends on. And the case sets only continue to grow, spanning mailboxes, ledgers, calls, and files in multiple languages, faster than any team can read them by hand.

So the work gets triaged rather than read in full. A keyword search finds what you already know to look for. What it misses, the nominee director, the shell three hops removed, the alias in transliteration, doesn't show up as a gap. It doesn't show up at all.

Tidebreak reads the entire set, not just a sample. It resolves entities across languages and aliases as it goes, so the network behind a name surfaces whether or not anyone thought to search for it. Every connection it draws is cited to the document that supports it; anything it can't back up is removed before it reaches you, not flagged for you to re-check. And a run doesn't end at a written report: the network graph, the entity map and the timeline all stay live, so you can keep working the case in the same place the finding came from.

The result is a lead you can act on immediately, and a finding you can put your name to.